Pastor Victor Kanyari’s family dispute with businessman Tash has taken another interesting turn after the businessman reportedly challenged claims surrounding a mansion the preacher has been showcasing on social media.
During his court testimony, Tash reportedly revealed that the property, which has been associated with a KSh 90 million valuation, is not located in Runda as many might have understood from Kanyari’s public statements.
Instead, he told the court that the mansion is situated in Kimbo, Daykio, along Thika Road in Kiambu County.
“Haiko Runda, iko Kimbo Daykio,” Tash reportedly stated, directly addressing the property’s location.
According to his testimony, the children had visited the property to create social media content but later returned to their actual residence.
The revelation comes amid an ongoing legal dispute involving Tash and members of Kanyari’s family, with property and the welfare of the children forming part of the disagreements.
Tash also addressed claims that he had prevented Kanyari from accessing his grandchildren.
He denied the accusations, telling the court that he had video recordings showing occasions when he handed the children over to their grandfather.
The businessman further discussed a financial arrangement that allegedly involved money received by the children following the burial of their late mother.
According to Tash, a meeting was held to establish a joint trust account for funds received from President William Ruto and Deputy President Kithure Kindiki.
He accused Kanyari of giving the public a misleading account of what happened during that meeting. However, the supplied report does not establish the details of the account or independently resolve the disagreement.
Another sensitive issue raised during the testimony concerned accusations linking Tash to the death of his late wife.
He acknowledged that the allegations had been made but maintained that the home where she died remained a crime scene under investigation by authorities.
Tash also claimed that the children had expressed concerns about their safety, explaining why he had been cautious about arrangements involving their access.
Meanwhile, Kanyari had not publicly responded to the specific claims highlighted in Tash’s testimony, according to the report.
The legal dispute therefore remains unresolved, with questions surrounding the children’s welfare, family finances and the disputed property still attracting attention.
For now, Tash’s statement about the mansion has introduced another dimension to the public disagreement, although the property’s ownership, valuation and exact circumstances surrounding its use have not been independently established in the supplied reporting.