Mike Sonko and Baby James have spoken out against pressure from the child’s family to return him to Kisii after a year of living under the former governor’s care.
The boy, who witnessed the death of his father, was taken in and supported during a difficult period. Over time, he has adjusted to a new environment and routine, which has helped him regain stability.
According to statements shared, the child has expressed fear and reluctance about going back. He said he feels safer in his current setting and asked that he not be forced to return. His words have drawn attention and concern from members of the public.
The former governor said the child has shown significant progress since being taken in. He noted improvements in his well being and daily life, adding that any decision about his future should consider his current condition.
The situation has become more complex after relatives, including an uncle, pushed for the child to be returned to the family home. This has created tension between the parties involved.
Supporters of the current arrangement argue that the child needs continuity and a stable environment. Others believe that family ties should be respected and that a resolution should involve all sides.
Observers say the matter highlights the challenges that can arise when care decisions involve extended family. They stress the importance of focusing on the child’s best interests.
The discussion continues as both sides maintain their positions, with attention centered on what will provide the safest and most stable future for the child.