The High Court in Nairobi has temporarily stopped President William Ruto’s plan to build a permanent church within the grounds of State House, pending the full hearing and determination of a legal challenge against the project.
In a ruling delivered by Justice Chacha Mwita, the court issued a conservatory order restraining the government and any of its representatives from proceeding with the proposed construction.
The decision follows a petition challenging the legality and constitutionality of establishing a religious facility on public property.
“A conservatory order is hereby issued restraining the government, its officers and or anyone acting on its behalf from constructing a permanent church or building associated with any religious faith within the grounds of State House, Nairobi, or any other State House or State Lodges,” Justice Mwita stated in his ruling.
President Ruto, who has frequently spoken publicly about his Christian faith, had announced plans to establish a modern, permanent church at State House Nairobi, citing the need for a dedicated space for worship and reflection for himself, his staff, and visiting dignitaries.
However, the proposal sparked controversy, with critics arguing that it violated the constitutional principle of separation between church and state.
Civil rights groups and sections of the legal community raised concerns about the use of public land and resources for religious purposes, warning that it could set a precedent for state endorsement of specific faiths in a religiously diverse nation.
The petition filed in court contends that the construction of a religious building on State House premises contravenes Articles 8 and 10 of the Kenyan Constitution, which prohibit the state from aligning with any particular religion and emphasize inclusivity, equality, and secular governance.
The petitioners argue that using public property for a church not only excludes other faiths but also blurs the line between state functions and religious practice.
As of now, there has been no official response from State House or the President’s legal team regarding the court’s decision.
However, insiders within the administration have previously defended the project as a personal initiative of the President, insisting that it would not utilize taxpayer funds and would be open to all Kenyans.
The case will now proceed to a full hearing where the court will consider arguments from both sides before making a final determination. Until then, any construction or preparatory work on the proposed church must cease.
This ruling adds to the ongoing national debate about the role of religion in public institutions, and how far the state can go in accommodating personal beliefs of its leaders while remaining faithful to constitutional principles.
By Creatorhub